Posted on
January 07, 2010 by
admin
Certainly, you have heard this assertion made before. In fact, I feel that this idea has become ubiquitous; which is sad, because I think that a lot of people would take up learning a new language if they didn’t feel that somehow the odds were stacked against them and that it is too late. Here is a quote that I took from the Linguistics Society of America. They are not the only ones to express this opinion but I think it will serve as a good example for argument.
“When you were born, you were not able to communicate with the adults around you using their language. But by the time you were five or six, you were able to produce sentences, understand jokes, make rhymes, and so on. In short, you became a fluent native speaker. All of this happened before you entered first grade! (If you studied a foreign language in high school, you know that learning a language later in life did not go nearly as smoothly or as quickly.) During those first few years of your life, you accumulated a wide range of knowledge about language.”
Lets take some of these statements and examine them.
“But by the time you were five or six, you were able to produce sentences, understand jokes, make rhymes, and so on.”
The important fact to pull from this is the time period – five or six years! Remember, as a child I would consider this full time study. From the moment they wake to the time they fall asleep they are analyzing and working on perfecting their language skills. Again, for five or six years.
“In short, you became a fluent native speaker.”
Please keep in mind that fluency is not a true/false issue but one that is based on a spectrum. Surely, you do not claim that a six year old is of the same fluency as a doctoral student.
“If you studied a foreign language in high school, you know that learning a language later in life did not go nearly as smoothly or as quickly.”
Here is where we must argue that we are not comparing apples with apples. When studying language at school, as I did for four years, you know that the amount of time in the target language is very minimal. In fact, it is likely that only a couple hours a day at best are spent studying the language. Moreover, as was the case in my school, you are not immersed into the learning experience. I was taught Spanish in English and the amount of time spent speaking the language was very little.* To the last part of this statement, I am not sure that learning English was easy as a child (it obviously wasn’t quick), but what other choice did we have.
Now, I don’t have a linguistics degree and neither do I have the experience that many of these linguistics have that assert this common belief but the facts do not appear to be conclusive. I think that if you placed an adult into a foreign culture where they were forced to speak and be surrounded in the target language 24/7 for five to six years you would find that they were at least able to speak at the level of a 1st grader. Although, I have the sneaky suspicion that they will be performing much better, as they will most likely have gained this level of fluency years before. It is up to you to decide if really kids are better at learning a second language but I say the jury is still out.
*Here is one way that kids may have an advantage. Practice makes perfect in language learning as with anything else and a child is much less nervous to speak incorrectly and learn from his/her mistakes than an adult in a classroom. One on one tutoring may be a solution for more timid language learners.